Department of Corrections
Posted February 17th, 2008 by Arnold Aprill
Tags:
One of the biggest challenges to teaching the arts is getting students beyond the fear of “messing up”. A student draws an unintended pencil line, balls up the work, and throws it away. Ask the student what’s going on, and the answer is likely to be “I messed up”, followed by downcast eyes and the sticking out of the lower lip. The value of drafts and the usefulness of mistakes can be difficult ideas to communicate in a school culture of testable right answers. But whether our work is in science or in social studies or in language arts or in the fine arts, we will never develop judgment if we need to BE right before we THINK right. Even mathematics, which is stereotyped as a world of correct answers, is really about the clarity, specificity, and elegance of symbolic descriptions of problems.
Abstract concepts are often difficult to share with young, concrete thinkers. Playwright Reginald Lawrence, of Chicago’s Ma’at Production Association of Afrikan Centered Theater, works at several Chicago public schools through the Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education. Part of MPAACT’s teaching methodology involves sharing with students the elements of story structure that playwrights and fiction writers use to create their work. Reggie, trying to explain the abstract nature of character motivation (such as wanting power, excitement, status, etc.) asked, “What is something you want that you can’t touch?” One precocious child tentatively put forward “An electric eel?”
It takes time to introduce learners to the joys of useful failures and experimentation. Meanwhile, there is another, more concrete strategy for responding to having “messed up”.
The eraser.
Edward Nairne, an English engineer, created the first rubber eraser in 1770. The gummy substance got its name from the “rubbing” action of erasing. Before that, white bread (without the crust) was used to erase pencil marks. But the raw rubber had some of the same limits as bread. It was perishable. In 1839, inventor Charles Goodyear discovered “vulcanization”- a process for curing rubber to make it durable, and the eraser became a common feature of any desk set.
In 1858, Hymen Lipman of Philadelphia received a patent for attaching a rubber eraser to a lead pencil. This patent was later revoked because it was determined that the pencil/eraser combo was just that- two different devices attached to each other, rather than an entirely new product.
The rubber eraser attached to pencils is typically pink, but erasers come in all colors, especially novelty erasers, that are formed into a wide variety of shapes as decorations and souvenirs. These novelty erasers don’t do much erasing.
And that’s messed up.
Arnold Aprill
Founding and Creative Director
Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education
www.capeweb.org
- Flag as offensive
- ArtsEdArn's blog
- Login or register to post comments


"Err-asers"---A Modern-Day Quick-Fix for Self-Preservation
Erasers, in all their usefulness and ability to give us another chance (over and over again), tend to make us human beings look for other more creative ways to hide our errors, to mask reality,to find comfort in quick-fixes and disregard logical solutions.
Making mistakes is supposed to lead us into finding a more open-ended path. The kind of path that will allow us to use our creativity and innovation---opportunities to utilize higher-order thinking skills. But how many times have we committed errors and immediately proceeded to search for an excuse, a reason, an alibi---yes, all these are considered "err-asers"----simply used to mask reality, escape from accountability, make a conscious choice to remain groundless and baseless, in short, "neutral," be in the gray area, avoid eye contact at all times lest you be proven guilty? All these are manifestations of man's innate need to be "normal." To be on the "safe side." TO BE ACCEPTED--and not to be erased from the list.
More often than not, I encounter moments in my life when I feel the urgent need to grab an "err-aser," but I guess my better choice would be to start off with a new sheet of paper to begin again instead. I don't need to use an "err-aser" when the need to make a moral decision arises.I don't want to mess up my life, and even worse...someone else's.